Recommended Reading

On January 25, 2007 at 4:31 pm by Emily Turner - Permanent Link
Categories: recommended reading, nonprofit blogs
-

Here in the Philanthropy Australia office we’ve started putting our feelers out into the more informal online publishing done by nonprofits around the globe. The UK and the USA both have a number of philanthropy blogs - both professional and personal (and sometimes both!) - sharing opinions, information, and links to news and research that bloggers think their readers will be interested in.

Looking around, as far as we can tell we’re the first philanthropy blog on the Australian blogging scene. Instead of just sharing the interesting tidbits on philanathropy that we come up with with each other here in the office, we’re going to be posting links to them in this philanthropyOz Blog, and letting you know why we think you should read them.

If you find anything we’ve missed, please feel free to leave a comment here or drop us an email. If you’d like to subscribe to updates, check out our info page on how to do so.

This week we’ve come across the following:

Wealthy charity donor driven away

This article reports that charitable tax considerations may have influenced the decision of New Zealand’s richest woman, Jan Cameron, to move to Tasmania. The article discusses the limitations of the tax law on donations in New Zealand, and Philanthropy New Zealand’s push to reform the system and remove disincentives to donating large amounts of money.


Philanthropy detected in brain scans!

“ALTRUISM, one of the most difficult human behaviours to define, can be detected in brain scans, US researchers claim. They found that activity in a specific area of the brain could predict altruistic behaviour — and people’s own reports of how selfish or giving they are.”


The 59 Smartest NP Organisations Online
(USA)
“These charities were chosen for their excellence in online storytelling and collaboration with their donors. We didn’t play favorites to one cause over another, nor did we look at their fundraising goals or number of members. Instead, these organizations are winners because of their web 2.0 smarts and a willingness to engage their constituents far beyond asking them to dig into their pockets.”


Blogs, Discussion and Charity

A response to The Chronicle of Philanthropy’s article in their December edition on philanthropy blogs, posted on TheIncubator, a USA nonprofit blog. (If you’re a Member of Philanthropy Australia and would like a copy of that article, please contact Emily at the Resource Centre.)


Also check out our News page, and if you’re a Member, PRESSing Matters, our weekly Australian media alert service.

1 Comment »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. With regards to the Jan Cameron article, a paper by Philanthropy New Zealand detailing NZ’s tax treatment of donations, and incentives/disincentives for giving, is available for download at Giving.org.nz. Very interesting paper, with international comparisons!

    Comment by Vanessa Meachen — January 29, 2007 #

Leave a comment

Please note that in order to prevent spam, comments on this blog are moderated, and thus may take a couple of days to be approved for posting. Please be assured that all legitimate comments will be approved for posting.

Please note that Philanthropy Australia is unable to supply advice to those seeking funding. All information we are able to provide on this topic is available on the Seeking Funding? page on our website. Any comments seeking advice for locating funding will be disregarded/not approved.

All other queries can be directed via our Contact Us page.

If you would like to comment on this blog post, please use the comment form below.

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez. Design modified by Philanthropy Australia.
All content © Philanthropy Australia 2007. See Copyright & Privacy Statements.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^